Monday, November 14, 2011

The Opposing Side's Views

The opposing side believes that video games are a waste of time.  They believe that video games can be training tools for murder and criminal activity.  Pundits such as the disabarred Miami lawyer, Jack Thompson have said that violent games such as Counter-Strike are "murder simulators", designed to train people to kill.  He says that games like Grand Theft Auto train people to commit violent criminal acts.

The first outcry for violent video games legislation was the release of a game called Death Race by a company called Exidy in 1976.  The game's objective was to run over stick figure like "gremlins" to earn points.  The depiction of the enemy characters were blocky humanoid stick figures.  The implication sparked an outrage and protests across the country occured which were led by an activist named Ronnie Lamm.  She appeared on CBS's 60 Minutes decrying the evils of video games.

The next controversy arose with the release of Mortal Kombat and Night Trap.  Mortal Kombat was a fighting game in the vein of Capcom's Street Fighter series but unlike Street Fighter featured large amounts of blood when fighters were struck by attacks.  The highlight of the game were the fatality moves. Fatalities were gory finishing moves that depicticted gruesome actions like ripping out someone's heart or spinal column.

Night Trap was a Full Motion Videogame that used footage of real actors and scenes.  It was criticized for being sexist and degrading to women.  Marilyn Droz, president of the National Coalition on Television Violence said:"The only thing I can say is shame on you.  How would you like your teenage daughter to go out on a date with somebody who just played three hours of that game." she said.  

5 comments:

  1. Nice topic sentence, it told the audience that video games can be viewed as dangerous.
    You supported your opinion with examples such as the new releases of Mortal Kombat and Night Trap. Your blog seems to run smoothly, the only thing I would change is have the quote mixed into the paragraph with a transition, not just at the end of the paragraph. Overall, nice blog, it informed me of the two different sides of the argument.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Topic sentence- that is a strong and good topic sentence.
    Support- You did a good job with using those examples the effects.
    Transitions- You used some transitions like (The first and the next), how about conclusion sentence.
    Quote (in "quote sandwich" format with proper MLA citation)- You have quotes, but they are not in the “Quote sandwich format”.
    Grammar and spelling- That’s fine!
    Strong argument- It was a convincing blog, you did a good job!
    You should work on your quotes/ I think if you talk more about general effects that would help your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Topic sentence- It was a strong topic sentence that got to thepoint.
    Support- There was great support about news articles from violent video games.
    Transitions- transitions were good and were smooth.
    Quote- the quote was good but it was not in the right format.
    Strong argument- Your argument was not very strong at all. You basically just listed what the opposing side would say but you never counteracted their argument.
    One good thing about this post is that it is very interesting to read.
    One suggestion is to go back and say why the opposing viewpoint is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Topic Sentence: Excellent definition. Clearly stated the views of the opposing side.
    Support: Excellent supportive material with examples.
    Transitions: Kept the flow of the post smooth with examples that tie into one another.
    Quote: Remember to explain your quote as well as cite it.
    Strong argument: Clearly listed the opposing sides views, but didn't counteract them (unless your saving that for a later post)

    One thing that I liked about the post was the fact that you used multiple sources (that I can tell) in order to find your examples. Just remember to back up your quotes in order to strengthen your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  5. On this recent post, there were some things you missed and some you didn't. Your topic sentence and support was great but you didn't quote in the correct format. Also, the argument was not very strong because you didn't explain enough on why the people said that and you should improve on your citations.

    ReplyDelete